Which metric measures the average time to fill a job opening from posting to offer acceptance?

Which metric measures the average time to fill a job opening from posting to offer acceptance?

• A. time-to-hire
• B. time-to-fill
• C. vacancy duration
• D. open-to-fill

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is measuring how long the entire recruiting process takes from the moment a job is posted to the point an offer is accepted. This end-to-end view captures how quickly you can move from opening the vacancy to closing it with an acceptance, including sourcing, screening, interviewing, and negotiation. The best metric for that full cycle is time-to-fill. It directly reflects the duration from posting a job to the acceptance of an offer, giving a clear picture of overall recruiting speed and where bottlenecks might occur. Time-to-hire, by contrast, starts later—it's measured from when a candidate enters the hiring process to the hire date—so it doesn't capture the initial posting-to-offer window. The other terms are less standard and can be ambiguous, whereas time-to-fill precisely describes the posting-to-offer timeline.

The main idea here is measuring how long the entire recruiting process takes from the moment a job is posted to the point an offer is accepted. This end-to-end view captures how quickly you can move from opening the vacancy to closing it with an acceptance, including sourcing, screening, interviewing, and negotiation.

The best metric for that full cycle is time-to-fill. It directly reflects the duration from posting a job to the acceptance of an offer, giving a clear picture of overall recruiting speed and where bottlenecks might occur.

Time-to-hire, by contrast, starts later—it's measured from when a candidate enters the hiring process to the hire date—so it doesn't capture the initial posting-to-offer window. The other terms are less standard and can be ambiguous, whereas time-to-fill precisely describes the posting-to-offer timeline.